Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23996332›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014

Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients.

Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, Kirstine Moll Harboe, Linda Bardram

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk surgical patients: is percutaneous cholecystostomy preferable to emergency cholecystectomy?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  6. A Cost-Utility Study of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Gallstones.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liv Bjerre Juul NielsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, livbjerre@icloud.com.
Kirstine Moll Harboe
Linda Bardram

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of Danish inhabitants older than 65 years is increasing, and cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for this age group. This study aimed to analyze the role of age as an independent predictor of outcome for elderly cholecystectomy patients.

methodsData from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database (2006-2010) were used. The outcomes of interest were conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, outpatient rate, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and frequency of additional procedures and death within 30 days postoperatively.

resultsIn this study, 697 patients 80 years of age or older and 4,915 patients ages 65-70 years were compared with 8,805 patients ages 50-64 years. Significantly more patients age 80 years or older underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis, and the conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly higher in the oldest group. The older patients had longer postoperative hospital stays, but nearly 30 % of the patients age 80 years or older were admitted for only 0-1 day and not readmitted, and nearly half of the patients were admitted for only 0-3 days without readmission. Also, the mortality rate and the number of patients who underwent additional procedures within 30 days were higher in the oldest group (6 vs 0.1 and 28 vs 15 %, respectively). A subanalysis of the patients age 80 years or older classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 1 and 2 without acute cholecystitis showed that 44 % left the hospital within 1 day and 63 % within 3 days without readmission and that the 30-day mortality rate was only 2 %.

conclusionsAge is an independent predictor for worse outcome after cholecystectomy. However, among otherwise healthy patients age 80 years or older who underwent surgery before acute inflammatory complications occurred, 63 % had a fast and uncomplicated course. Thus, it seems fair to recommend elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy when repeated gallstone symptoms have occurred also for the older patient, particularly before the patient experiences acute cholecystitis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteCholedocholithiasisCholelithiasisComorbidityConversion to Open SurgeryDatabases, FactualDenmarkElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of Stay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.