Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23996231›Full record

ArticleOecologia2014

Experimental evaluation of imprinting and the role innate preference plays in habitat selection in a coral reef fish.

Danielle L Dixson, Geoffrey P Jones, Philip L Munday, Serge Planes, Morgan S Pratchett, Simon R Thorrold

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The real Nemo movie: Description of embryonic development in Amphiprion ocellaris from first division to hatching.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A star is born again: Methods for larval rearing of an emerging model organism, the False clownfish Amphiprion ocellaris.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multiple environmental cues impact habitat choice during nocturnal homing of specialized reef shrimp.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  18. Early life experience influences dispersal in coyotes (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Danielle L DixsonSchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, 4811, Townsville, QLD, Australia, danielle.dixson@biology.gatech.edu.
Geoffrey P Jones
Philip L Munday
Serge Planes
Morgan S Pratchett
Simon R Thorrold
James Cook University · AUARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When facing decisions about where to live, juveniles have a strong tendency to choose habitats similar to where their parents successfully bred. Developing larval fishes can imprint on the chemical cues from their natal habitat. However, to demonstrate that imprinting is ecologically important, it must be shown that settlers respond and distinguish among different imprinted cues, and use imprinting for decisions in natural environments. In addition, the potential role innate preferences play compared to imprinted choices also needs to be examined. As environmental variability increases due to anthropogenic causes these two recognition mechanisms, innate and imprinting, could provide conflicting information. Here we used laboratory rearing and chemical choice experiments to test imprinting in larval anemonefish (Amphiprion percula). Individuals exposed to a variety of benthic habitat or novel olfactory cues as larvae either developed a preference for (spent >50% of their time in the cue) or increased their attraction to (increased preference but did not spend >50% of their time in the cue) the cue when re-exposed as settlers. Results indicate not only the capacity for imprinting but also the ability to adjust innate preferences after early exposure to a chemical cue. To test ecological relevance in the natural system, recruits were collected from anemones and related to their parents, using genetic parentage analysis, providing information on the natal anemone species and the species chosen at settlement. Results demonstrated that recruits did not preferentially return to their natal species, conflicting with laboratory results indicating the importance imprinting might have in habitat recognition.

Indexed as

Coral ReefsCuesImprinting, PsychologicalAnimalsFishesLarvaSmell

Identifiers

PMID23996231
OpenAlexW1998731593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.