ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2013
Expression variation of the porcine ADRB2 has a complex genetic background.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploration of genotype-by-environment interactions affecting gene expression responses in porcine immune cells.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing of Xiangxi Cattle Identifies Genomic Diversity and Selection Signatures.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Omics Application in Animal Science-A Special Emphasis on Stress Response and Damaging Behaviour in Pigs.Genes · 2020Review
- Analysis of allele-specific expression of seven candidate genes involved in lipid metabolism in pig skeletal muscle and fat tissues reveals allelic imbalance of ACACA, LEP, SCD, and TNF.Journal of applied genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Identification and Functional Characterization of Cis-Regulatory Elements Controlling Expression of the Porcine ADRB2 Gene.International journal of biological sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine adrenergic receptor beta 2 (ADRB2) gene exhibits differential allelic expression in skeletal muscle, and its genetic variation has been associated with muscle pH. Exploring the molecular-genetic background of expression variation for porcine ADRB2 will provide insight into the mechanisms driving its regulatory divergence and may also contribute to unraveling the genetic basis of muscle-related traits in pigs. In the present study, we therefore examined haplotype effects on the expression of porcine ADRB2 in four tissues: longissimus dorsi muscle, liver, subcutaneous fat, and spleen. The diversity and structure of haplotypes of the proximal gene region segregating in German commercial breeds were characterized. Seven haplotypes falling into three clades were identified. Two clades including five haplotypes most likely originated from introgression of Asian genetics during formation of modern breeds. Expression analyses revealed that the Asian-derived haplotypes increase expression of the porcine ADRB2 compared to the major, wild-type haplotype independently of tissue type. In addition, several tissue-specific differences in the expression of the Asian-derived haplotypes were found. Inspection of haplotype sequences showed that differentially expressed haplotypes exhibit polymorphisms in a polyguanine tract located in the core promoter region. These findings demonstrate that expression variation of the porcine ADRB2 has a complex genetic basis and suggest that the promoter polyguanine tract is causally involved. This study highlights the challenges of finding causal genetic variants underlying complex traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.