SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014
Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency versus intactness for outcomes in patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Bearing dislocation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in East Asian countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Pooled it
- Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Pooled it
- Ninety-three point seven percent pooled 10-year survival rate following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for isolated lateral knee osteoarthritis-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Mobile Versus Fixed-Bearing in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Average 10-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Patient-specific versus off-the-shelf unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during level walking.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Analysis of causes for revision in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Reducing edge loading and alignment outliers with image-free robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a case controlled study.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2024Article
- Factors predicting lower limb alignment after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Painful Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Review
- Early Outcomes of Modified Technique of Mobile Bearing Unicondylar Knee Replacement.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- No difference in the use of revision components and rerevision rate in conversion to total knee replacement following Oxford Partial Knee Microplasty Instrumentation: a registry study of 529 conversions.Acta orthopaedica · 2023Article
- Effects of a 1-mm difference in bearing thickness on intraoperative bearing movement and kinematics in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Potential factors in postoperative dislocation of Oxford phase III mobile bearing UKA in Chinese patients: a single-center retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Excellent outcomes with Oxford Uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty in anteromedial osteoarthritis patients (≤60 years) at mid-term follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: high survivorship and good patient-related outcomes at a minimum five years of follow-up.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Bearing failure in a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an uncommon presentation of an implant-specific complication.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2021Article
- A Soft- Tissue Injury Diagnosis in Knee Replacement Patients cannot be made without a Plain Radiograph.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2021Article
- Can accuracy of component alignment be improved with Oxford UKA Microplasty® instrumentation?Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRevision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively rare, but there is concern that the minimally invasive approach might result in more complications and a higher rate of revision. Current data regarding the revision of UKA using the Oxford phase 3 prosthesis are confined to a few reviews of single-institution experience. The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based summarisation of the revision of UKA with a pooled analysis of the reported cases.
methodsA systematic review of published studies that evaluated the causes that required further surgical intervention after UKA using the Oxford phase 3 prosthesis was performed. A structured literature review of multiple databases referenced articles from 1998 to 2012. The revision rates between Asian population and western population were compared.
resultsA total of 2,683 patients (3,138 knees) from 17 published studies were assessed. The median age of the patients was 62.5 (range 32-93) years. The median follow-up period was 5.6 (range 0.1-11) years. Postoperative revision was necessary in 146 knees with a pooled percentage of 4.6 %. Bearing dislocation was found to be the single most important predisposing cause of revision, with a pooled percentage of 1.5 % (47/3,138 knees). The rate of bearing dislocation was significantly higher in Asian population than that in western population (p < 0.001).
conclusionsMobile bearing UKA seems to be less appropriate for the Asian population as extreme knee flexion is required for cultural purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.