Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23995936›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013

Prevalences of Shiga toxin subtypes and selected other virulence factors among Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from fresh produce.

Peter C H Feng, Shanker Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence and Implications of Shiga Toxin-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. ABToxins · 2022
    Review
  6. Genomic Characteristics of Stx2e-ProducingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Improved Genomic Identification, Clustering, and Serotyping of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Variants ofToxins · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mechanism of inhibition of Shiga-toxigenicCell death discovery · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Serogroups, subtypes and virulence factors of shiga toxin-producingGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Shiga Toxin Subtypes of Non-O157Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter C H FengDivision of Microbiology, U.S. FDA, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Shanker Reddy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) strains were isolated from a variety of fresh produce, but mostly from spinach, with an estimated prevalence rate of 0.5%. A panel of 132 produce STEC strains were characterized for the presence of virulence and putative virulence factor genes and for Shiga toxin subtypes. About 9% of the isolates were found to have the eae gene, which encodes the intimin binding protein, and most of these belonged to known pathogenic STEC serotypes, such as O157:H7 and O26:H11, or to serotypes that reportedly have caused human illness. Among the eae-negative strains, there were three O113:H21 strains and one O91:H21 strain, which historically have been implicated in illness and therefore may be of concern as well. The ehxA gene, which encodes enterohemolysin, was found in ∼60% of the isolates, and the saa and subAB genes, which encode STEC agglutinating adhesin and subtilase cytotoxin, respectively, were found in ∼30% of the isolates. However, the precise roles of these three putative virulence factors in STEC pathogenesis have not yet been fully established. The stx1a and stx2a subtypes were present in 22% and 56%, respectively, of the strains overall and were the most common subtypes among produce STEC strains. The stx2d subtype was the second most common subtype (28% overall), followed by stx2c (7.5%), and only 2 to 3% of the produce STEC strains had the stx2e and stx2g subtypes. Almost half of the produce STEC strains had only partial serotypes or were untyped, and most of those that were identified belonged to unremarkable serotypes. Considering the uncertainties of some of these Stx subtypes and putative virulence factors in causing human illness, it is difficult to determine the health risk of many of these produce STEC strains.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyAdhesins, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsFood ContaminationGenes, BacterialHemolysin ProteinsSerotypingShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliShiga ToxinsSpinacia oleraceaVirulence FactorsAdhesins, BacterialenterohemolysinEscherichia coli ProteinsHemolysin ProteinsHlya protein, E coliShiga ToxinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID23995936
PMCPMC3811557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.