ArticleCalcified tissue international2013
Relationship between bone cross-sectional area and indices of peripheral artery disease.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lifestyle Management of Diabetes: Implications for the Bone-Vascular Axis.Current diabetes reports · 2018Review
- Bone mineral density and microarchitecture linkages with micro- and macro-vascular impairments at the hand in systemic sclerosis: an HRpQCT study.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Bone Mineral Density and Cognitive Decline in Elderly Women: Results from the InCHIANTI Study.Calcified tissue international · 2016Article
- Parathyroid hormone concentration and risk of cardiovascular diseases: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.American heart journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Most studies on the relationship between bone mineral density and atherosclerosis have used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, but this method is relatively insensitive to bone geometry. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between bone area and indices of carotid and peripheral atherosclerosis. We studied 841 persons aged 65 years or older (women = 444, mean age 73.8 years; men = 397, mean age = 75.3 years) enrolled in the InCHIANTI study and free from active malignancies, chronic use of bisphosphonates or steroids, and estrogen replacement therapy. The tibial cortical and total cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and their ratio was calculated (cortical/total cross-sectional area ratio, cCSA/tCSA); carotid plaques were screened by echography, and peripheral artery disease (PAD) was defined as an ankle/brachial index <0.9 or presence of intermittent claudication. No association between cCSA/tCSA and atherosclerosis was observed in men. In women, lower cCSA/tCSA was associated with both carotid plaques [odds ratio (OR) for lowest vs. best quartile = 2.09, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.68] and PAD (OR = 3.43, 95 % CI 1.58-8.12). After correction for potential confounders (age since menopause, body mass index, Parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, leptin, DHEA-S, testosterone, physical activity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and reduced renal function), the association was not confirmed. According to partial logistic regression, the carotid plaque-cCSA/tCSA association, but not the PAD-cCSA/tCSA association, was mostly dependent on years since menopause. In women the association between osteoporosis and carotid plaques likely reflects hormonal deprivation, whereas that between osteoporosis and PAD seems multifactorial in origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.