ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2013
Novel initiatives of the National Institutes of Health to support congenital heart disease research.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trials in children's heart surgery in the 21st century: a systematic review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Advances in the treatment of aortic valve disease: is it time for companion diagnostics?Current opinion in pediatrics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn fiscally challenging times, scientists must seek creative strategies and leverage existing resources to advance research. RECENT
findingsThis review describes programmes supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to promote research in paediatric cardiology and congenital heart disease (CHD). SUMMARY: An understanding of NHLBI-supported research programmes will help investigators identify opportunities to collaborate with existing systems and use scientific results from existing efforts to catalyse future research in CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.