Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23995388›Full record

ArticleNature methods2013

Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing.

Derek S Lundberg, Scott Yourstone, Piotr Mieczkowski, Corbin D Jones, Jeffery L Dangl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 479 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
479citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

479 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insights into the food safety implications of a commercialApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Commensal skin bacteria interact with the innate immune system to promote tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The bacteria of a fig community.Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article

419 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Derek S Lundberg1] Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. [2] Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. [3].
Scott Yourstone
Piotr Mieczkowski
Corbin D Jones
Jeffery L Dangl

Funding

NRSA IN GENETICST32GM007092 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 1985 to 2019
$5.9M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007092NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553-06NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07092-34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe improvements for sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicons, a cornerstone technique in metagenomics. Through unique tagging of template molecules before PCR, amplicon sequences can be mapped to their original templates to correct amplification bias and sequencing error with software we provide. PCR clamps block amplification of contaminating sequences from a eukaryotic host, thereby substantially enriching microbial sequences without introducing bias.

Indexed as

BacteriaMetagenomeSoil MicrobiologyClassificationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoftwareRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23995388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.