Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23995299›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Monoaminergic modulation of behavioural and electrophysiological indices of error processing.

Jessica J M Barnes, Redmond G O'Connell, L Sanjay Nandam, Angela J Dean, Mark A Bellgrove

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Pharmacological Manipulations of Physiological Arousal and Sleep-Like Slow Waves Modulate Sustained Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Trial
  3. Learning Experience Reverses Catecholaminergic Effects on Adaptive Behavior.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of cognitive control in humans and rats.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jessica J M BarnesThe University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Redmond G O'Connell
L Sanjay Nandam
Angela J Dean
Mark A Bellgrove
University of Queensland · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUTrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleError processing is a critical executive function that is impaired in a large number of clinical populations. Although the neural underpinnings of this function have been investigated for decades and critical error-related components in the human electroencephalogram (EEG), such as the error-related negativity (ERN) and the error positivity (Pe), have been characterised, our understanding of the relative contributions of key neurotransmitters to the generation of these components remains limited.

objectivesThe current study sought to determine the effects of pharmacological manipulation of the dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin neurotransmitter systems on key behavioural and event-related potential correlates of error processing.

methodsA randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover design was employed. Monoamine levels were manipulated using the clinically relevant drugs methylphenidate, atomoxetine and citalopram, in comparison to placebo. Under each of the four drug conditions, participants underwent EEG recording while performing a flanker task.

resultsOnly methylphenidate produced significant improvement in performance accuracy, which was without concomitant slowing of reaction time. Methylphenidate also increased the amplitude of an early electrophysiological index of error processing, the ERN. Citalopram increased the amplitude of the correct-response negativity, another component associated with response processing.

conclusionsThe effects of methylphenidate in this study are consistent with theoretical accounts positing catecholamine modulation of error monitoring. Our data suggest that enhancing catecholamine function has the potential to remediate the error-monitoring deficits that are seen in a wide range of psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

Adrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCitalopramCross-Over StudiesDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDouble-Blind MethodEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidateNeuropsychological TestsPropylaminesPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCitalopramDopamine Uptake InhibitorsMethylphenidatePropylaminesSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23995299
OpenAlexW2024755979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.