Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23995295›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care

Safety and acceptability of couples HIV testing and counseling for US men who have sex with men: a randomized prevention study.

Patrick S Sullivan, Darcy White, Eli S Rosenberg, Jasper Barnes, Jeb Jones, Sharoda Dasgupta, Brandon O'Hara, Lamont Scales, Laura F Salazar, Gina Wingood and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Couples Have a Way of Speaking: Examining the Characteristics and Stability of Communication Style in HIV Testing Sessions With Male Couples.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick S SullivanRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Darcy White
Eli S Rosenberg
Jasper Barnes
Jeb Jones
Sharoda Dasgupta
Brandon O'Hara
Lamont Scales
Laura F Salazar
Gina Wingood
Ralph DiClemente
Kristin M Wall
Colleen Hoff
Beau Gratzer
Susan Allen
Rob Stephenson
Emory University · USAID Atlanta · USGeorgia State University · USHoward Brown Health Center · USSan Francisco State University · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Adaptation of Couples Voluntary Counseling and Testing (CVCT) for US MSMR34MH086331 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2009 to 2010
$706k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI050409NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH086331NIMH NIH HHS R34-MH086331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested a couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) intervention with male couples in Atlanta by randomizing eligible couples to receive either CHTC or separate individual voluntary HIV counseling and testing (iVCT). To evaluate the acceptability and safety of CHTC, main outcomes were satisfaction with the intervention and the proportions of couples reporting intimate partner violence (IPV) and relationship dissolution after the service. The results indicated that the service was very acceptable to men (median 7-item index of satisfaction was 34 for CHTC and 35 for iVCT, P = .4). There was no difference in either incident IPV (22% versus 17% for CHTC and iVCT, respectively, P = .6) or relationship dissolution (42% versus 51% for CHTC and iVCT, respectively, P = .5). Based on the preliminary data, CHTC is safe for male couples, and it is equally acceptable to iVCT for men who have main partners.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultCounselingHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpouse AbuseUnited StatesYoung AdultHIVmale couplesmen who have sex with mentesting services

Identifiers

PMID23995295
PMCPMC3954957
OpenAlexW2108484847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.