Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23995264›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2013

Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (99 m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma.

Byung Hyun Byun, Chang-Bae Kong, Ilhan Lim, Byung Il Kim, Chang Woon Choi, Won Seok Song, Wan Hyeong Cho, Dae-Geun Jeon, Jae-Soo Koh, Soo-Yong Lee and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness ofBMC cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bone tumors: state-of-the-art imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of PET/CT on Paediatric Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic response as assessed byCancer medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byung Hyun ByunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), 75 Nowongil, Nowon Gu, Seoul, 139-706, Republic of Korea, nmbbh@hanmail.net.
Chang-Bae Kong
Ilhan Lim
Byung Il Kim
Chang Woon Choi
Won Seok Song
Wan Hyeong Cho
Dae-Geun Jeon
Jae-Soo Koh
Soo-Yong Lee
Sang Moo Lim
Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and (99 m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy (BS) for the detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 206 patients with stage II-IV osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy as well as at least one paired PET/CT and BS scan (defined as an examination). PET/CT and BS images were interpreted separately. When analyzing the diagnostic yield of a combination of PET/CT and BS (PET/CT+BS), an examination was considered positive if either PET/CT or BS scored positive. The final diagnosis was obtained from histological findings or clinical follow-up with imaging studies for at least 6 months. Diagnostic performances of PET/CT, BS, and their combinations were calculated.

resultsOut of 833 examinations in 206 patients, 55 with 101 lesions in 38 patients were confirmed as bone metastases. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 95, 98, and 98%, respectively, for PET/CT; 76, 97, and 96%, respectively, for BS; and 100, 96, and 97%, respectively, for PET/CT+BS in an examination-based analysis. Lesion-based analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity of PET/CT+BS (100%) was significantly higher than that of PET/CT (92%) or BS (74%) alone. BS detected significantly less bone metastases in the growth plate region than outside the growth plate region (22 vs. 77%).

conclusionsPET/CT is more sensitive and accurate than BS for diagnosing bone metastases in osteosarcoma. The combined use of PET/CT and BS improves sensitivity.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Technetium Tc 99m MedronateAdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingOsteosarcomaPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Medronate

Identifiers

PMID23995264
OpenAlexW2052028442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.