ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2013
Imidafenacin has no influence on learning in nucleus basalis of Meynert-lesioned rats.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive effects of individual anticholinergic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) increases with age, and much attention has been paid to the risk of cognitive impairment which may be induced by antimuscarinics used for OAB in patients with AD. Imidafenacin, an antimuscarinic agent for OAB treatment, has been reported not to affect learning in normal animals. However, under the condition in which sensitivity to learning impairment by antimuscarinics is increased, it remains unclear whether imidafenacin still does not impair the learning. Therefore, the influences of imidafenacin on passive avoidance response were investigated in sham-operated and nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM)-lesioned rats and compared with oxybutynin hydrochloride and tolterodine tartrate. The learning-inhibitory doses of intravenous oxybutynin hydrochloride and tolterodine tartrate were 0.3 and 3 mg/kg in sham-operated rats and 0.1 and 1 mg/kg in nbM-lesioned rats, respectively. Thus, the learning impairments by those antimuscarinics were more sensitive in nbM-lesioned rats than in sham-operated rats. On the other hand, intravenous administration of imidafenacin had no influence on learning in either case of the rats. In normal rats, however, intracerebroventricular administration of imidafenacin impaired learning to the same degree as that of oxybutynin hydrochloride. Thus, the present study suggests that imidafenacin, unlike the other antimuscarinics used, has no significant risk of enhancing learning impairment even in models whose sensitivity to learning impairment by antimuscarinics is commonly increased, probably because of its low brain penetration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.