Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23994670›Full record

ReviewClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2014

Treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain: an expert review.

Enrique Coss-Adame, Askin Erdogan, Satish S C Rao

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Botulinum Toxin Injections for Esophageal Motility Disorders.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Esophageal Chest Pain.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015
    Article
  9. [Chronic chest pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrique Coss-AdameSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia.
Askin ErdoganSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia.
Satish S C RaoSection of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia. Electronic address: srao@gru.edu.

Funding

Cytokines and the blood-brain barrier in the ovine fetusR01HD057100 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI STONESTREET, BARBARA S · 2008 to 2020
$3.8M
Novel Treatment Strategies for Constipation and Role of Brain-Gut axisR01DK057100 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI RAO, SATISH SC · 2000 to 2011
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057100NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK057100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsChest pain is a common and frightening symptom. Once cardiac disease has been excluded, an esophageal source is most likely. Pathophysiologically, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal dysmotility, esophageal hypersensitivity, and anxiety disorders have been implicated. However, treatment remains a challenge. Here we examined the efficacy and safety of various commonly used modalities for treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain (ECP) and provided evidence-based recommendations.

methodsWe reviewed the English language literature for drug trials evaluating treatment of ECP in PubMed, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases from 1968-2012. Standard forms were used to abstract data regarding study design, duration, outcome measures and adverse events, and study quality.

resultsThirty-five studies comprising various treatments were included and grouped under 5 broad categories. Patient inclusion criteria were extremely variable, and studies were generally small with methodological concerns. There was good evidence to support the use of omeprazole and fair evidence for lansoprazole, rabeprazole, theophylline, sertraline, trazodone, venlafaxine, imipramine, and cognitive behavioral therapy. There was poor evidence for nifedipine, diltiazem, paroxetine, biofeedback therapy, ranitidine, nitrates, botulinum toxin, esophageal myotomy, and hypnotherapy.

conclusionsIdeally, treatment of ECP should be aimed at correcting the underlying mechanism(s) and relieving symptoms. Proton pump inhibitors, antidepressants, theophylline, and cognitive behavioral therapy appear to be useful for the treatment of ECP. However, there is urgent and unmet need for effective treatments and for rigorous, randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsChest PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyEsophageal DiseasesHumansProton Pump InhibitorsPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsTheophyllineTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsProton Pump InhibitorsPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsTheophyllineBehavioral TherapyEsophageal Chest PainGERDHypersensitivityNoncardiac Chest Pain Treatment

Identifiers

PMID23994670
PMCPMC3938572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.