Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23994471›Full record

ArticleCell reports2013

Divergent contributions of conserved active site residues to transcription by eukaryotic RNA polymerases I and II.

Olga V Viktorovskaya, Krysta L Engel, Sarah L French, Ping Cui, Paul J Vandeventer, Emily M Pavlovic, Ann L Beyer, Craig D Kaplan, David A Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Higher-order epistasis within Pol II trigger loop haplotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga V ViktorovskayaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-0024, USA.
Krysta L Engel
Sarah L French
Ping Cui
Paul J Vandeventer
Emily M Pavlovic
Ann L Beyer
Craig D Kaplan
David A Schneider
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

Training Program in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental BiologyT32GM008111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YODER, BRADLEY K. · 1985 to 2022
$5.4M
Control of RNA polymerase I transcription initiation and elongationR01GM084946 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SCHNEIDER, DAVID ALAN · 2009 to 2020
$3.8M
Visualizing Genetic Activity in Normal & Mutant YeastR01GM063952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BEYER, ANN L. · 2001 to 2013
$3.7M
Mechanism and Regulation of RNA Polymerase II ElongationR01GM097260 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAPLAN, CRAIG · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063952NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM063952NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084946NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM084946NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097260NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM097260NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisubunit RNA polymerases (msRNAPs) exhibit high sequence and structural homology, especially within their active sites, which is generally thought to result in msRNAP functional conservation. However, we show that mutations in the trigger loop (TL) in the largest subunit of RNA polymerase I (Pol I) yield phenotypes unexpected from studies of Pol II. For example, a well-characterized gain-of-function mutation in Pol II results in loss of function in Pol I (Pol II: rpb1- E1103G; Pol I: rpa190-E1224G). Studies of chimeric Pol II enzymes hosting Pol I or Pol III TLs suggest that consequences of mutations that alter TL dynamics are dictated by the greater enzymatic context and not solely the TL sequence. Although the rpa190-E1224G mutation diminishes polymerase activity, when combined with mutations that perturb Pol I catalysis, it enhances polymerase function, similar to the analogous Pol II mutation. These results suggest that Pol I and Pol II have different rate-limiting steps.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataRNA Polymerase IRNA Polymerase IITranscription, GeneticRNA Polymerase IRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID23994471
PMCPMC3801175
OpenAlexW1974568567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.