Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23994285›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2013

Role of nuclear receptors in blastocyst implantation.

Y M Vasquez, F J DeMayo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. METTL3-dependent mCell death & disease · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. METTL3 is essential for normal progesterone signaling during embryo implantation via mProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. P38α MAPK is a gatekeeper of uterine progesterone responsiveness at peri-implantation via Ube3c-mediated PGR degradation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Role of SIRT1 and Progesterone Resistance in Normal and Abnormal Endometrium.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y M VasquezDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
F J DeMayo
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

TRANSGENIC MOUSE MODELS TO STUDY OVARIAN FUNCTIONU54HD007495 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DEMAYO, FRANCESCO JOHN · 1998 to 2013
$19.9M
Molecular Analysis of Uterine ReceptivityR01HD042311 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LYDON, JOHN P · 2009 to 2023
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042311NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD007495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of blastocyst implantation in the uterus is orchestrated by the ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone. These hormones act via their nuclear receptors to direct the transcriptional activity of the endometrial compartments and create a defined period in which the uterus is permissive to embryo implantation termed the "window of receptivity". Additional members of the nuclear receptor family have also been described to have a potential role in endometrial function. Much of what we know about the function of these nuclear receptors during implantation we have learned from the use of mouse models. Transgenic murine models with targeted gene ablation have allowed us to identify a complex network of paracrine signaling between the endometrial epithelium and stroma. While some of the critical molecules have been identified, the mechanism underlying the intricate communication between endometrial compartments during the implantation window has not been fully elucidated. Defining this mechanism will help identify markers of a receptive uterine environment, ultimately providing a useful tool to help improve the fertility outlook for reproductively challenged couples. The aim of this review is to outline our current understanding of how nuclear receptors and their effector molecules regulate blastocyst implantation in the endometrium.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationAnimalsCircadian RhythmHumansReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSignal TransductionReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearDecidualizationEstrogenImplantationNuclear receptorProgesteroneReceptivity

Identifiers

PMID23994285
PMCPMC3849351
OpenAlexW2001983551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.