Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23994125›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Infrared neural stimulation of primary visual cortex in non-human primates.

Jonathan M Cayce, Robert M Friedman, Gang Chen, E Duco Jansen, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen, Anna W Roe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04601337 (Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Infrared Neural Stimulation During Nerve Transfers), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04601337 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Infrared Neural Stimulation During Nerve Transfers

TypeobservationalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsInfrared Neural Stimulation (INS)ArmsInfrared Neural Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan M CayceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert M Friedman
Gang Chen
E Duco Jansen
Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Anna W Roe

Funding

Optical Imaging of Tactile Information in SI CortexR01NS044375 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, ROBERT MARK, ROE, ANNA W. · 2003 to 2012
$3.6M
Optical stimulation of neural tissueR01NS052407 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JANSEN, E. DUCO · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
Optical Imaging of Tactile Information in S1 CortexR56NS044375 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A, ROE, ANNA W. · 2008 to 2008
$491k
Functional mapping of cortical networks in primates with laser stimulationR21MH095009 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ROE, ANNA W. · 2012 to 2013
$411k
NIMH NIH HHS MH095009NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH095009NINDS NIH HHS NS44375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044375NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052407NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052407-01NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS044375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infrared neural stimulation (INS) is an alternative neurostimulation modality that uses pulsed infrared light to evoke spatially precise neural activity that does not require direct contact with neural tissue. With these advantages INS has the potential to increase our understanding of specific neural pathways and impact current diagnostic and therapeutic clinical applications. In order to develop this technique, we investigate the feasibility of INS (λ=1.875μm, fiber diameter=100-400μm) to activate and modulate neural activity in primary visual cortex (V1) of Macaque monkeys. Infrared neural stimulation was found to evoke localized neural responses as evidenced by both electrophysiology and intrinsic signal optical imaging (OIS). Single unit recordings acquired during INS indicated statistically significant increases in neuron firing rates that demonstrate INS evoked excitatory neural activity. Consistent with this, INS stimulation led to focal intensity-dependent reflectance changes recorded with OIS. We also asked whether INS is capable of stimulating functionally specific domains in visual cortex and of modulating visually evoked activity in visual cortex. We found that application of INS via 100μm or 200μm fiber optics produced enhancement of visually evoked OIS response confined to the eye column where INS was applied and relative suppression of the other eye column. Stimulating the cortex with a 400μm fiber, exceeding the ocular dominance width, led to relative suppression, consistent with involvement of inhibitory surrounds. This study is the first to demonstrate that INS can be used to either enhance or diminish visual cortical response and that this can be done in a functional domain specific manner. INS thus holds great potential for use as a safe, non-contact, focally specific brain stimulation technology in primate brains.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysAction PotentialsAnimalsBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, VisualFeasibility StudiesHumansMacacaNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID23994125
PMCPMC4120263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.