Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23993303›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2013

Intraperitoneal delivery of human natural killer cells for treatment of ovarian cancer in a mouse xenograft model.

Melissa A Geller, David A Knorr, David A Hermanson, Lee Pribyl, Laura Bendzick, Valarie McCullar, Jeffrey S Miller, Dan S Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Innovative landscapes in intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa A GellerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
David A Knorr
David A Hermanson
Lee Pribyl
Laura Bendzick
Valarie McCullar
Jeffrey S Miller
Dan S Kaufman
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Mark J Osborn · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008244 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SHIMIZU, YOJI · 1988 to 2024
$13.6M
TRAINING IN HEMOGLOBIN &CELL MEMBRANE RESEARCHT32HL007062 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller, Gregory M Vercellotti · 1985 to 2026
$10.3M
Hematopoietic precursor development from human ES cellsR01HL077923 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KAUFMAN, DAN S. · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
Stem Cell Biology Training ProgramT32HD060536 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KAUFMAN, DAN S. · 2010 to 2014
$779k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077923NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL77923NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007062NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060536NICHD NIH HHS T32HD060536NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsThere is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies for relapsed ovarian cancer. Dramatic clinical anti-tumor effects have been observed with interleukin (IL)-2 activated natural killer (NK) cells; however, intravenous delivery of NK cells in patients with ovarian cancer has not been successful in ameliorating disease. We investigated in vivo engraftment of intraperitoneally (IP) delivered NK cells in an ovarian cancer xenograft model to determine if delivery mode can affect tumor cell killing and circumvent lack of NK cell expansion.

methodsAn ovarian cancer xenograft mouse model was established to evaluate efficacy of IP-delivered NK cells. Tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescent imaging of luciferase-expressing ovarian cancer cells. NK cell persistence, tumor burden and NK cell trafficking were evaluated. Transplanted NK cells were evaluated by flow cytometry and cytotoxicity assays.

resultsIP delivery of human NK cells plus cytokines led to high levels of circulating NK and was effective in clearing intraperitoneal ovarian cancer burden in xenografted mice. NK cells remained within the peritoneal cavity 54 days after injection and had markers of maturation. Additionally, surviving NK cells were able to kill ovarian cancer cells at a rate similar to pre-infusion levels, supporting that in vivo functionality of human NK cells can be maintained after IP infusion.

conclusionsIP delivery of NK cells leads to stable engraftment and antitumor response in an ovarian cancer xenograft model. These data support further pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of IP delivery of allogeneic NK cells in ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveInjections, IntraperitonealInterleukin-2K562 CellsKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte ActivationMiceAntigens, DifferentiationCancer VaccinesInterleukin-2bioluminescent imagingimmunotherapynatural killer (NK) cellsovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID23993303
PMCPMC3775496
OpenAlexW2029144175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.