Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23993093›Full record

ArticleCell2013

A transcriptome-wide atlas of RNP composition reveals diverse classes of mRNAs and lncRNAs.

Alex Charles Tuck, David Tollervey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex Charles TuckThe University of Edinburgh, Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Michael Swann Building, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK.
David TollerveyThe University of Edinburgh, Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Michael Swann Building, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK. Electronic address: d.tollervey@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBWellcome Centre for Cell Biology · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 077248Wellcome Trust 086587Wellcome Trust 092076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes generate a heterogeneous ensemble of mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). LncRNAs and mRNAs are both transcribed by Pol II and acquire 5' caps and poly(A) tails, but only mRNAs are translated into proteins. To address how these classes are distinguished, we identified the transcriptome-wide targets of 13 RNA processing, export, and turnover factors in budding yeast. Comparing the maturation pathways of mRNAs and lncRNAs revealed that transcript fate is largely determined during 3' end formation. Most lncRNAs are targeted for nuclear RNA surveillance, but a subset with 3' cleavage and polyadenylation features resembling the mRNA consensus can be exported to the cytoplasm. The Hrp1 and Nab2 proteins act at this decision point, with dual roles in mRNA cleavage/polyadenylation and lncRNA surveillance. Our data also reveal the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of mRNA maturation, and highlight a subset of "lncRNA-like" mRNAs regulated by the nuclear surveillance machinery.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeRibonucleoproteinsRNA, FungalRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeRibonucleoproteinsRNA, FungalRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23993093
PMCPMC3778888
OpenAlexW2137499975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.