Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23992415›Full record

ArticleExpert review of proteomics2013

Promotion of cancer metastasis: candidate validation using an iTRAQ-based approach.

Caroline Evans, Bernard Corfe

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of proteomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline EvansChELSI Institute, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Bernard Corfe
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of: Ghosh D, Li Z, Tan XF, Lim TK, Mao Y, Lin Q. RAQ based quantitative proteomics approach validated the role of calcyclin binding protein (CacyBP) in promoting colorectal cancer metastasis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 12(7), 1865-1880 (2013). The use of iTRAQ-based relative quantification is demonstrated by Ghosh et al. to analyze the downstream effectors of a calcyclin-binding protein, which is proposed to promote colorectal cancer progression. These findings are reviewed and discussed in relation to the need to establish robust in vitro model cell lines for identification of cancer-specific pathways and to confirm the leads generated by proteomic analysis.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisCalcium-Binding ProteinsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansCalcium-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23992415
OpenAlexW2094616860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.