ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2013
Chinese family with atypical granular corneal dystrophy type I caused by the typical R555W mutation in TGFBI.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deterioration of Avellino corneal dystrophy in a Chinese family after LASIK.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Identification of a Heterozygous Mutation in theJournal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Mutation analysis of TGFBI and KRT12 in a case of concomitant keratoconus and granular corneal dystrophy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017Article
- Uncovering the profile of mutations of transforming growth factor beta-induced gene in Chinese corneal dystrophy patients.International journal of ophthalmology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the clinical features and genetic defects in four generations of a Chinese family affected with atypical granular corneal dystrophy type I (GCD type I).
methodsFamily history and clinical data were recorded. Genomic DNA samples were obtained from peripheral blood leukocytes of all participated. Exons of the transforming growth factor-β-induced (TGFBI) gene were directly sequenced after being amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and multi-point linkage analysis using microsatellite makers flanking the gene was applied to identify the disease-causing mutation.
resultsClinical features were quite variable in patients, some patients only had opacities in the epithelium, and others revealed multiple bilateral circular, discrete, crumb-like opacities mainly in the epithelium, with several in different depths of corneal stroma, and the performance was different bilaterally, even in the same patient. Directly nucleotide sequencing revealed a heterozygous p.R555W mutation in the coding sequence of the TGFBI gene in all affected individuals of the family, but was not found in all unaffected. The maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) score obtained by multi-point analysis was detected at marker locus D5S393 (LOD=2.740; α=1.000).
conclusionOur case presented with clinical futures and the pathogenic mutations in TGFBI gene, the phenotype of the pedigree was quite different from typical GCD type I, so we suggested that this phenotype was a variant of GCD type I. These findings expand the knowledge about GCD type I, and demonstrate that molecular genetic analysis is important to make an accurate diagnosis of patients with variable corneal dystrophies in clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.