ArticlePloS one2013
Electrical stimulation promotes wound healing by enhancing dermal fibroblast activity and promoting myofibroblast transdifferentiation.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Making Sense of Electrical Stimulation: A Meta-analysis for Wound Healing.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of electrical stimulation on diabetic ulcers of foot and lower limb: A systematic review.International wound journal · 2022Pooled it
- Electrical stimulation therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2016Pooled it
- Effect of dual direct and alternating currents on pain induced by blood sampling and intramuscular injection processes.Pain management · 2025Trial
- Cardio-microcurrent device treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Results from the C-MIC II open-label randomized controlled trial.European journal of heart failure · 2025Trial
- Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Mechanical, Redox, and Bioelectrical Coupling in Hydrogels for Cutaneous Regeneration: Network Design and Structure-Property Relationships.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Thiolated Hyaluronic Acid-graft-PEDOT Dressing With Antifouling, On-Demand Drug Delivery and Electrical Stimulation for Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Multifunctional conductive dressings for wound healing support.Chemical science · 2026Review
- A Data Driven Review of In Vitro Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation for Post-Acute Phase Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Quantum modeling of Stokes-Induced Stark Fields in quercetin-ZnO nanohybrids for bias-free bioelectric repair of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Progress in the application of conductive hydrogels in wound healing: a review.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Advances in electroactive materials-based strategies for promoting skin wound healing.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Electrospun PEDOT-Based Meshes for Skin Regeneration.Polymers · 2025Article
- Microenvironment-feedback regulated hydrogels as living wound healing materials.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Kv1.3 Ion Channels Mediate Electrical Stimulation-Induced Collagen Expression in Human Dermal Fibroblasts.Cosmetics · 2025Article
- A Bioelectrically Enabled Smart Bandage for Accelerated Wound Healing and Predictive Monitoring.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Enhancing Burn Recovery: A Systematic Review on the Benefits of Electrical Stimulation in Accelerating Healing.European burn journal · 2025Review
- Advancing Chronic Wound Healing through Electrical Stimulation and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical stimulation (ES) has long been used as an alternative clinical treatment and an effective approach to modulate cellular behaviours. In this work we investigated the effects of ES on human skin fibroblast activity, myofibroblast transdifferentiation and the consequence on wound healing. Normal human fibroblasts were seeded on heparin-bioactivated PPy/PLLA conductive membranes, cultured for 24 h, and then exposed to ES of 50 or 200 mV/mm for 2, 4, or 6 h. Following ES, the cells were either subjected to various analyses or re-seeded to investigate their healing capacity. Our findings show that ES had no cytotoxic effect on the fibroblasts, as demonstrated by the similar LDH activity levels in the ES-exposed and non-exposed cultures, and by the comparable cell viability under both conditions. Furthermore, the number of viable fibroblasts was higher following exposure to 6 h of ES than in the non-exposed culture. This enhanced cell growth was likely due to the ES up-regulated secretion of FGF-1 and FGF-2. In an in vitro scratch-wound assay where cell monolayer was used as a healing model, the electrically stimulated dermal fibroblasts migrated faster following exposure to ES and recorded a high contractile behaviour toward the collagen gel matrix. This enhanced contraction was supported by the high level of α-smooth muscle actin expressed by the fibroblasts following exposure to ES, indicating the characteristics of myofibroblasts. Remarkably, the modulation of fibroblast growth continued long after ES. In conclusion, this work demonstrates for the first time that exposure to ES promoted skin fibroblast growth and migration, increased growth factor secretion, and promoted fibroblast to myofibroblast transdifferentiation, thus promoting wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.