ArticlePloS one2013
Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Assessing sustained uptake of latrine and child feces management interventions: Extended follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 1-3.5 years after intervention initiation.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2023Trial
- Achieving equitable uptake of handwashing and sanitation by addressing both supply and demand-based constraints: findings from a randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh.International journal for equity in health · 2021Trial
- Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment.BMJ open · 2019Trial
- The impact of a rural sanitation programme on safe disposal of child faeces: a cluster randomised trial in Odisha, India.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2016Trial
- Village sanitation and child health: Effects and external validity in a randomized field experiment in rural India.Journal of health economics · 2016Trial
- Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India.BMC research notes · 2014Trial
- The effect of India's total sanitation campaign on defecation behaviors and child health in rural Madhya Pradesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2014Trial
- Implementation and adaptation of WASH FIT in healthcare facilities: A systematic scoping review.World development sustainability · 2026Article
- Behavioral patterns in latrine use and handwashing in rural western Kenya: Age, time of day, and the role of perceived safety.PloS one · 2026Article
- Geospatial analysis of diarrheal disease burden and associated health determinants among under-five children in Karnataka using NFHS data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with hypertension in rural areas of Naubatpur block of Patna District in Bihar, India: a population-based cluster cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Household ownership of latrines does not ensure use: a scoping review.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Latrine Utilization and Associated Factors Among Households in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Environmental health insights · 2025Review
- Psychological and socio-cultural factors affecting latrine ownership and usage in rural South India.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Development of a behaviour change intervention to promote sanitation and latrine use in rural India.BMC public health · 2023Review
- Barriers of household toilet utilization among toilet owners in a rural area of Northern India: An analytical cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFaced with a massive shortfall in meeting sanitation targets, some governments have implemented campaigns that use subsidies focused on latrine construction to overcome income constraints and rapidly expand coverage. In settings like rural India where open defecation is common, this may result in sub-optimal compliance (use), thereby continuing to leave the population exposed to human excreta.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate latrine coverage and use among 20 villages (447 households, 1933 individuals) in Orissa, India where the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign had been implemented at least three years previously. We defined coverage as the proportion of households that had a latrine; for use we identified the proportion of households with at least one reported user and among those, the extent of reported use by each member of the household.
resultsMean latrine coverage among the villages was 72% (compared to <10% in comparable villages in the same district where the Total Sanitation Campaign had not yet been implemented), though three of the villages had less than 50% coverage. Among these households with latrines, more than a third (39%) were not being used by any member of the household. Well over a third (37%) of the members of households with latrines reported never defecating in their latrines. Less than half (47%) of the members of such households reported using their latrines at all times for defecation. Combined with the 28% of households that did not have latrines, it appears that most defecation events in these communities are still practiced in the open.
conclusionA large-scale campaign to implement sanitation has achieved substantial gains in latrine coverage in this population. Nevertheless, gaps in coverage and widespread continuation of open defecation will result in continued exposure to human excreta, reducing the potential for health gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.