Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990899›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Can yeast (S. cerevisiae) metabolic volatiles provide polymorphic signaling?

J Roman Arguello, Carolina Sellanes, Yann Ru Lou, Robert A Raguso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Liquid Baits withInsects · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits ofThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of advanced research · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. AreEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evolution of herbivory in Drosophilidae linked to loss of behaviors, antennal responses, odorant receptors, and ancestral diet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Roman ArguelloDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Carolina Sellanes
Yann Ru Lou
Robert A Raguso

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical signaling between organisms is a ubiquitous and evolutionarily dynamic process that helps to ensure mate recognition, location of nutrients, avoidance of toxins, and social cooperation. Evolutionary changes in chemical communication systems progress through natural variation within the organism generating the signal as well as the responding individuals. A promising yet poorly understood system with which to probe the importance of this variation exists between D. melanogaster and S. cerevisiae. D. melanogaster relies on yeast for nutrients, while also serving as a vector for yeast cell dispersal. Both are outstanding genetic and genomic models, with Drosophila also serving as a preeminent model for sensory neurobiology. To help develop these two genetic models as an ecological model, we have tested if - and to what extent - S. cerevisiae is capable of producing polymorphic signaling through variation in metabolic volatiles. We have carried out a chemical phenotyping experiment for 14 diverse accessions within a common garden random block design. Leveraging genomic sequences for 11 of the accessions, we ensured a genetically broad sample and tested for phylogenetic signal arising from phenotypic dataset. Our results demonstrate that significant quantitative differences for volatile blends do exist among S. cerevisiae accessions. Of particular ecological relevance, the compounds driving the blend differences (acetoin, 2-phenyl ethanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol) are known ligands for D. melanogasters chemosensory receptors, and are related to sensory behaviors. Though unable to correlate the genetic and volatile measurements, our data point clear ways forward for behavioral assays aimed at understanding the implications of this variation.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAcetoinAdsorptionAlcoholsChromatography, GasGenetic VariationGenomicsMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPentanolsPhenotypePhenylethyl AlcoholPhylogenyAcetoinAlcoholsisopentyl alcoholPentanolsPhenylethyl Alcohol

Identifiers

PMID23990899
PMCPMC3747187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.