Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990792›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Regulation of sister chromosome cohesion by the replication fork tracking protein SeqA.

Mohan C Joshi, David Magnan, Timothy P Montminy, Mark Lies, Nicholas Stepankiw, David Bates

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA Methylation in Prokaryotes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohan C JoshiDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
David Magnan
Timothy P Montminy
Mark Lies
Nicholas Stepankiw
David Bates
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008497 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI WILSON, CARA C. · 1993 to 2022
$15.2M
Research Education and Career Horizons ProgramK12GM084897 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SIFERS, RICHARD NORMAN, SLAUGHTER, GAYLE · 2008 to 2016
$8.3M
Dynamics and regulation of sister chromosome cohesion in E. coli.R01GM102679 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BATES, DAVID · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM102679NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM084897NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM08497NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102679NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analogously to chromosome cohesion in eukaryotes, newly replicated DNA in E. coli is held together by inter-sister linkages before partitioning into daughter nucleoids. In both cases, initial joining is apparently mediated by DNA catenation, in which replication-induced positive supercoils diffuse behind the fork, causing newly replicated duplexes to twist around each other. Type-II topoisomerase-catalyzed sister separation is delayed by the well-characterized cohesin complex in eukaryotes, but cohesion control in E. coli is not currently understood. We report that the abundant fork tracking protein SeqA is a strong positive regulator of cohesion, and is responsible for markedly prolonged cohesion observed at "snap" loci. Epistasis analysis suggests that SeqA stabilizes cohesion by antagonizing Topo IV-mediated sister resolution, and possibly also by a direct bridging mechanism. We show that variable cohesion observed along the E. coli chromosome is caused by differential SeqA binding, with oriC and snap loci binding disproportionally more SeqA. We propose that SeqA binding results in loose inter-duplex junctions that are resistant to Topo IV cleavage. Lastly, reducing cohesion by genetic manipulation of Topo IV or SeqA resulted in dramatically slowed sister locus separation and poor nucleoid partitioning, indicating that cohesion has a prominent role in chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

Bacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsChromosomesChromosome SegregationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationDNA Topoisomerase IVDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsOrigin Recognition ComplexProtein BindingSister Chromatid ExchangeBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerase IVDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIEscherichia coli ProteinsOriC chromosomal replication originOrigin Recognition ComplexSeqA protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID23990792
PMCPMC3749930
OpenAlexW2053243729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.