Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990777›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2013

Asparagine repeats in Plasmodium falciparum proteins: good for nothing?

Vasant Muralidharan, Daniel E Goldberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Semi-synthesis of the C-terminal region ofRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Overexpression inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vasant MuralidharanCenter for Tropical & Emerging Global Diseases and Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America. vasant@uga.edu
Daniel E Goldberg

Funding

ROLE OF CHAPERONES IN MAINTAINING THE ASPARAGINE REPEAT-RICH PROTEOME OF P. FALCIR00AI099156 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI MURALIDHARAN, VASANT · 2013 to 2014
$498k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS 4R00AI099156-02NIAID NIH HHS R00 AI099156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanRepetitive Sequences, Amino AcidTrinucleotide RepeatsAsparaginePlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAsparagineProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23990777
PMCPMC3749963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.