Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990771›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Transcriptional regulation of lineage commitment--a stochastic model of cell fate decisions.

Jose Teles, Cristina Pina, Patrik Edén, Mattias Ohlsson, Tariq Enver, Carsten Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contributions of transcriptional noise to leukaemia evolution: KAT2A as a case-study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Nature and Niche Nurture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jose TelesComputational Biology & Biological Physics, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cristina Pina
Patrik Edén
Mattias Ohlsson
Tariq Enver
Carsten Peterson
Lund University · SEStem Cell Institute · PAUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12796Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular mechanisms employed by individual multipotent cells at the point of lineage commitment remain largely uncharacterized. Current paradigms span from instructive to noise-driven mechanisms. Of considerable interest is also whether commitment involves a limited set of genes or the entire transcriptional program, and to what extent gene expression configures multiple trajectories into commitment. Importantly, the transient nature of the commitment transition confounds the experimental capture of committing cells. We develop a computational framework that simulates stochastic commitment events, and affords mechanistic exploration of the fate transition. We use a combined modeling approach guided by gene expression classifier methods that infers a time-series of stochastic commitment events from experimental growth characteristics and gene expression profiling of individual hematopoietic cells captured immediately before and after commitment. We define putative regulators of commitment and probabilistic rules of transition through machine learning methods, and employ clustering and correlation analyses to interrogate gene regulatory interactions in multipotent cells. Against this background, we develop a Monte Carlo time-series stochastic model of transcription where the parameters governing promoter status, mRNA production and mRNA decay in multipotent cells are fitted to experimental static gene expression distributions. Monte Carlo time is converted to physical time using cell culture kinetic data. Probability of commitment in time is a function of gene expression as defined by a logistic regression model obtained from experimental single-cell expression data. Our approach should be applicable to similar differentiating systems where single cell data is available. Within our system, we identify robust model solutions for the multipotent population within physiologically reasonable values and explore model predictions with regard to molecular scenarios of entry into commitment. The model suggests distinct dependencies of different commitment-associated genes on mRNA dynamics and promoter activity, which globally influence the probability of lineage commitment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationModels, BiologicalCell DifferentiationCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGATA2 Transcription FactorGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-3Models, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, MessengerStochastic ProcessesGATA2 Transcription FactorGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-3myelopoietinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23990771
PMCPMC3749951
OpenAlexW1970001441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.