ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters result from competitive binding of transcription factors that interact with chromatin modifiers.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026Review
- Article
- A study of strong nucleosomes in the human genome.iScience · 2022Article
- Peritoneal Effluent Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With and Without Peritonitis.Kidney medicine · 2022Article
- The Active Mechanism of Nucleosome Depletion by Poly(dA:dT) Tracts In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Thermodynamic modeling of genome-wide nucleosome depleted regions in yeast.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Absolute nucleosome occupancy map for theGenome research · 2019Article
- Dynamics of Chromatin and Transcription during Transient Depletion of the RSC Chromatin Remodeling Complex.Cell reports · 2019Article
- Nucleosome remodeling at origins of global genome-nucleotide excision repair occurs at the boundaries of higher-order chromatin structure.Genome research · 2019Article
- Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- Nucleosome fragility is associated with future transcriptional response to developmental cues and stress in C. elegans.Genome research · 2017Article
- Global genome nucleotide excision repair is organized into domains that promote efficient DNA repair in chromatin.Genome research · 2016Article
- Categorical spectral analysis of periodicity in nucleosomal DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- High-Throughput Identification of Cis-Regulatory Rewiring Events in Yeast.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- The interplay between nucleoid organization and transcription in archaeal genomes.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2015Review
- Nucleosome positioning in yeasts: methods, maps, and mechanisms.Chromosoma · 2015Review
- Global mapping of DNA conformational flexibility on Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Functional redundancy of transcription factors explains why most binding targets of a transcription factor are not affected when the transcription factor is knocked out.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
- Terminate and make a loop: regulation of transcriptional directionality.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2014Review
- Fuzziness and noise in nucleosomal architecture.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because DNA packaging in nucleosomes modulates its accessibility to transcription factors (TFs), unraveling the causal determinants of nucleosome positioning is of great importance to understanding gene regulation. Although there is evidence that intrinsic sequence specificity contributes to nucleosome positioning, the extent to which other factors contribute to nucleosome positioning is currently highly debated. Here we obtained both in vivo and in vitro reference maps of positions that are either consistently covered or free of nucleosomes across multiple experimental data-sets in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We then systematically quantified the contribution of TF binding to nucleosome positioning using a rigorous statistical mechanics model in which TFs compete with nucleosomes for binding DNA. Our results reconcile previous seemingly conflicting results on the determinants of nucleosome positioning and provide a quantitative explanation for the difference between in vivo and in vitro positioning. On a genome-wide scale, nucleosome positioning is dominated by the phasing of nucleosome arrays over gene bodies, and their positioning is mainly determined by the intrinsic sequence preferences of nucleosomes. In contrast, larger nucleosome free regions in promoters, which likely have a much more significant impact on gene expression, are determined mainly by TF binding. Interestingly, of the 158 yeast TFs included in our modeling, we find that only 10-20 significantly contribute to inducing nucleosome-free regions, and these TFs are highly enriched for having direct interactions with chromatin remodelers. Together our results imply that nucleosome free regions in yeast promoters results from the binding of a specific class of TFs that recruit chromatin remodelers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.