ArticlePatient preference and adherence2013
Role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in effective contraception.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03594604 (Norethindrone Versus Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills for the Delay of Menstruation), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Norethindrone Versus Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills for the Delay of Menstruation
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Norethindrone is superior to combined oral contraceptive pills in short-term delay of menses and onset of breakthrough bleeding: a randomized trial.BMC women's health · 2019Trial
- The impact of prior hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) use on endometrial lining thickness in the fertility clinic setting: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Cancer Risk Profile of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- A rat model of oral hormonal contraception: Effects on drug preference and gonadal function.Behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Transient Hyperprolactinemia Associated With Semaglutide in a Patient With Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.Case reports in medicine · 2026Article
- Association between combined oral contraceptive prescription and cervical artery dissection: A retrospective cohort study.Thrombosis research · 2025Article
- Long-acting intrauterine systems: Recent advances, current challenges, and future opportunities.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Application of Modeling and Simulation to Identify a Shortened Study Duration and Novel Bioequivalence Metric for a Long-Acting Intrauterine System.The AAPS journal · 2022Article
- Depressive Disorder With Panic Attacks After Replacement of an Intrauterine Device Containing Levonorgestrel: A Case Report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Contraception counseling for women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD): current perspectives.Open access journal of contraception · 2019Article
- Use of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Women With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Norgestrel, a synthetic progestin chemically derived from 19-nortestosterone, is six times more potent than progesterone, with variable binding affinity to various steroid receptors. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) provides a long-acting, highly effective, and reversible form of contraception, with a pearl index of 0.18 per 100 women-years. The locally released hormone leads to endometrial concentrations that are 200-800 times those found after daily oral use and a plasma level that is lower than that with other forms of levonorgestrel-containing contraception. The contraceptive effect of the LNG IUS is achieved mainly through its local suppressive effect on the endometrium, leading to endometrial thinning, glandular atrophy, and stromal decidualization without affecting ovulation. The LNG IUS is generally well tolerated. The main side effects are related to its androgenic activity, which is usually mild and transient, resolving after the first few months. Menstrual abnormalities are also common but well tolerated, and even become desirable (eg, amenorrhea, hypomenorrhea, and oligomenorrhea) with proper counseling of the patient during the choice of the method of contraception. The satisfaction rates after 3 years of insertion are high, reaching between 77% and 94%. The local effect of the LNG IUS on the endometrium and low rates of systemic adverse effects have led to its use in other conditions rather than contraception, as for the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, benign menorrhagia, endometriosis, adenomyosis, and uterine fibroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.