Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2013
Bioequivalence study of two formulations of candesartan cilexetil tablet in healthy subjects under fasting conditions.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- No pharmacokinetic interactions between candesartan and amlodipine following multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Trial
- From In Vivo Predictive Dissolution to Virtual Bioequivalence: A GastroPlusPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of candesartan cilexetil tablet in Chinese volunteers under fasting condition: an open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Formulation and Bioavailability of Novel Mucoadhesive Buccal Films for Candesartan Cilexetil in Rats.Membranes · 2021Article
- Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil/amlodipine besylate (16/10 mg) versus coadministration of individual formulations in healthy subjects.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Review
- A Comparative Pharmacokinetics Study of the Anti-Parkinsonian Drug Pramipexole.Scientia pharmaceutica · 2016Article
- Glycosuria medicated with ipragliflozin and nifedipine or ipragliflozin and candesartan: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe present study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two candesartan cilexetil 16 mg tablet formulations (test and reference formulations). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was a randomized, single- blind, two-period, cross-over study which included 24 healthy adult male and female subjects under fasting conditions. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined based on the concentrations of candesartan (CAS 139481-59-7), using ultra-pressure high-performance liquid chromatography with a tandem mass spectrometer detector. In each of the two study periods (separated by a washout period of 1 week), a single dose of test or reference product was administered. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) from time 0 hours to 24 hours, AUC from time zero to infinity, the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), time to achieve the Cmax, and the elimination half-life.
resultsThe geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the test drug/reference drug for candesartan were 100.92% (92.15%-110.52%) for the AUC from 0 hours to 24 hours, 100.24% (92.24%-108.95%) for the AUC from time zero to infinity, and 106.71% (93.20%-122.18%) for the Cmax. The differences between the test and reference product in the time to achieve Cmax values and elimination half-life values were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio of candesartan were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence. There was no adverse event encountered during this bioequivalence study.
conclusionIt was concluded that the two candesartan tablet formulations (the test and reference product) were bioequivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.