Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990525›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2013

Determination of intracellular unbound concentrations and subcellular localization of drugs in rat sandwich-cultured hepatocytes compared with liver tissue.

Nathan D Pfeifer, Kevin B Harris, Grace Zhixia Yan, Kim L R Brouwer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Drug Biliary Excretion Using Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intracellular Unbound Atorvastatin Concentrations in the Presence of Metabolism and Transport.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan D PfeiferDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kevin B Harris
Grace Zhixia Yan
Kim L R Brouwer
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

ALTERED HEPATIC DISPOSITION OF ANIONIC DRUGS-MECHANISMSR01GM041935 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BROUWER, KIM L.R. · 1997 to 2016
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041935NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM41935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of clinical efficacy, toxicity, and drug-drug interactions may be improved by accounting for the intracellular unbound drug concentration (C(unbound)) in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, subcellular drug distribution may aid in predicting efficacy, toxicity, and risk assessment. The present study was designed to quantify the intracellular C(unbound) and subcellular localization of drugs in rat sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) compared with rat isolated perfused liver (IPL) tissue. Probe drugs with distinct mechanisms of hepatocellular uptake and accumulation were selected for investigation. Following drug treatment, SCH and IPL tissues were homogenized and fractionated by differential centrifugation to enrich for subcellular compartments. Binding in crude lysate and cytosol was determined by equilibrium dialysis; the C(unbound) and intracellular-to-extracellular C(unbound) ratio (K(pu,u)) were used to describe accumulation of unbound drug. Total accumulation (K(pobserved)) in whole tissue was well predicted by the SCH model (within 2- to 3-fold) for the selected drugs. Ritonavir (K(pu,u) ∼1) was evenly distributed among cellular compartments, but highly bound, which explained the observed accumulation within liver tissue. Rosuvastatin was recovered primarily in the cytosolic fraction, but did not exhibit extensive binding, resulting in a K(pu,u) >1 in liver tissue and SCH, consistent with efficient hepatic uptake. Despite extensive binding and sequestration of furamidine within liver tissue, a significant portion of cellular accumulation was attributed to unbound drug (K(pu,u) >16), as expected for a charged, hepatically derived metabolite. Data demonstrate the utility of SCH to predict quantitatively total tissue accumulation and elucidate mechanisms of hepatocellular drug accumulation such as active uptake versus binding/sequestration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedDrug InteractionsHepatocytesLiverMalePharmaceutical PreparationsRatsRats, WistarTissue DistributionPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23990525
PMCPMC3807053
OpenAlexW2007423008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.