Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990496›Full record

Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2014

Procalcitonin: diagnostic value in systemic infections in chronic kidney disease or renal transplant patients.

Raluca Dumea, Dimitrie Siriopol, Simona Hogas, Irina Mititiuc, Adrian Covic

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raluca DumeaDialysis and Renal Transplantation Center, "Dr. C.I. Parhon" University Hospital, B-dul Carol I, nr. 50, Iasi, Romania.
Dimitrie Siriopol
Simona Hogas
Irina Mititiuc
Adrian Covic
Spitalul Clinic Dr. C. I. Parhon · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough procalcitonin (PCT) has been described as a marker of infection and inflammation, it has not been extensively studied in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), end stage renal disease, or renal transplant.

methodsPCT was routinely tested in 82 (56 dialyzed patients and 28 renal transplant recipients) consecutive cases with a strong clinical suspicion of infection, during a 6-month period, in a single referral unit.

resultsDuring the study period, 58/82 cases had confirmed infections as per definition. Patients with confirmed infections had higher values for PCT [median = 2.5 ng/mL, interquartile range (IR) = 0.9-5 ng/mL] than those without (median = 0.3 ng/mL, IR = 0.1-0.5 ng/mL), p < 0.001. Overall, for a cutoff value of 0.5 ng/mL, the sensitivity of the test was 93.1 % and the specificity 78.6.

conclusionOur data indicate that significantly elevated PCT concentrations offer good sensitivity and specificity for the early diagnosis of systemic bacterial infection in patients with CKD.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalBacteremiaBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinEnterocolitisFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID23990496
OpenAlexW2059287857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.