Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990452›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2014

Laparoscopic single-anastomosis duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG): short-term result and comparison with gastric bypass.

Wei-Jei Lee, Kuo-Ting Lee, Kazunori Kasama, Yosuke Seiki, Kong-Han Ser, Shu-Chun Chun, Jung-Chien Chen, Yi-Chih Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03165812 (Single Anastomosis Duodeno Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03165812 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Single Anastomosis Duodeno Jejunal Bypass With Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) Versus Intensive Medical Therapy (IMT) in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among Asian Patients With BMI 23.5 - 30 kg/m2: A Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled84ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, OverweightArmsSADJB-SG group, IMT group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei-Jei LeeDepartment of Surgery, Min-Sheng General Hospital, No. 168, Chin Kuo Road, Tauoyan, Taiwan, wjlee_obessurg_tw@yahoo.com.tw.
Kuo-Ting Lee
Kazunori Kasama
Yosuke Seiki
Kong-Han Ser
Shu-Chun Chun
Jung-Chien Chen
Yi-Chih Lee
Min Sheng General Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWChien Hsin University of Science and Technology · TWYotsuya Medical Cube · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic duodeno-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (DJB-SG) has been introduced as a novel metabolic surgery from Asia recently. It provides benefits of avoiding the risk of remnant gastric cancer, minimization of malnutrition from duodenal switch. Here, we introduce the technique of single-loop anastomosis duodeno-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) and compare with other gastric bypass surgeries. Fifty morbid obese patients underwent our novel procedure, laparoscopic SADJB-S from 2011 to 2013. Operative complication, weight loss, and diabetes remission were followed. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 181.7 ± 38.4 min, and the mean hospital stay was 3.8 days. Three minor early complications (6 %) were encountered but no major complication was noted. There was no significant difference in perioperative parameters between the SADJB-SG and gastric bypass except a longer operation time. The mean BMI decreased from 38.4 to 25.4 at 1 year after surgery with a mean weight loss of 32.7 % which is higher than gastric bypass. Laparoscopic SADJB-SG appears to be an ideal metabolic/bariatric surgery, whereas the efficacy is non-inferior to gastric bypass.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomosis, SurgicalBariatric SurgeryDuodenumFemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansJejunumLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23990452
OpenAlexW1992860288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.