ReviewCurrent oncology reports2013
Acute promyelocytic leukemia: do we have a new front-line standard of treatment?
Review in Current oncology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Analysis of early death factors and prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2020Article
- miR-638 in circulating leukaemia cells as a non-invasive biomarker in diagnosis, treatment response and MRD surveillance of acute promyelocytic leukaemia.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2020Article
- From conventional therapy toward microRNA-based therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia.Advanced biomedical research · 2016Review
- Arsenate stimulates glutathione export from viable cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons.Neurochemical research · 2015Article
- Targeted therapy with MXD3 siRNA, anti-CD22 antibody and nanoparticles for precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid, the use of this molecularly targeted treatment in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy has completely changed the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia, turning it into the most curable myeloid leukemia. Also, the use of risk-adapted protocols has contributed to optimizing the drug combination and the most appropriate dose intensity for each subset of patients classified according to both the risk of relapse and vulnerability to drug toxicity. Recent developments have included the investigation of the role of arsenic trioxide as front-line treatment after its success in treating relapsed APL, both to minimize or even omit the use of cytotoxic agents and to improve the outcome of the conventional chemotherapy-based approach. In this review, we discuss the current treatment approach for acute promyelocytic leukemia in newly diagnosed patients, particularly taking into account the latest developments with the use of the arsenic trioxide based regimen as targeted first-line treatment without chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23990383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.