ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2016
Variable selection in semi-parametric models.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cohort Profile: The Isle Of Wight Whole Population Birth Cohort (IOWBC).International journal of epidemiology · 2018Observational
- Unified variable selection in semi-parametric models.Statistical methods in medical research · 2017Article
- Multigenerational cohorts in patients with asthma and allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2017Review
- DNA methylation loci associated with atopy and high serum IgE: a genome-wide application of recursive Random Forest feature selection.Genome medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We propose Bayesian variable selection methods in semi-parametric models in the framework of partially linear Gaussian and problit regressions. Reproducing kernels are utilized to evaluate possibly non-linear joint effect of a set of variables. Indicator variables are introduced into the reproducing kernels for the inclusion or exclusion of a variable. Different scenarios based on posterior probabilities of including a variable are proposed to select important variables. Simulations are used to demonstrate and evaluate the methods. It was found that the proposed methods can efficiently select the correct variables regardless of the feature of the effects, linear or non-linear in an unknown form. The proposed methods are applied to two real data sets to identify cytosine phosphate guanine methylation sites associated with maternal smoking and cytosine phosphate guanine sites associated with cotinine levels with creatinine levels adjusted. The selected methylation sites have the potential to advance our understanding of the underlying mechanism for the impact of smoking exposure on health outcomes, and consequently benefit medical research in disease intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.