ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2013
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign's Revised Sepsis Bundles.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of sepsis in patients with malignancy.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- The ongoing challenge of ventilator-associated pneumonia: epidemiology, prevention, and risk factors for mortality in a secondary care hospital intensive care unit.Infection prevention in practice · 2023Article
- Echovirus-7 Infection in Children with Unusual Severe Manifestation: A Case Report.Infection & chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Characterization of human peripheral blood γδ T cells in patients with sepsis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Adherence to the SEP-1 Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset v. Community-Onset Sepsis: a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- [Value of blood lactic acid in evaluating disease severity and prognosis in children with sepsis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2016Article
- Prognostic value of CD4(+)CD25(+) Tregs as a valuable biomarker for patients with sepsis in ICU.World journal of emergency medicine · 2015Article
- Impact of appropriate antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock--a quality improvement study.PloS one · 2014Article
- The duration of hypotension determines the evolution of bacteremia-induced acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) sepsis care bundles have recently been revised. The original 6-h resuscitation bundle which included rapid antibiotic administration and hemodynamic support with early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) has been divided into two bundles; one including antibiotic and fluid support to be completed within 3 h, and the other including vasopressor support and measures of central venous pressure and oxygen saturation to be completed within 6 h. The original 24-h management bundle targeting glucose control, administration of corticosteroids and recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC), and limitation of plateau airway pressures during mechanical ventilation is no longer recommended. Past and recent reports by the SSC and others have suggested that compliance with the original bundles was low and their impact unclear. Examination of the revised bundles in the context of issues and questions arising with the original ones suggest that while compliance with new 3-h bundle will be high, compliance with the 6-h bundle will continue to be low.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.