ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2013
Issues potentially affecting quality of life arising from long-term medicines use: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medication-related experiences of patients with polypharmacy: a systematic review of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Medication-related burden and patients' lived experience with medicine: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.BMJ open · 2016Pooled it
- Effects of a pharmaceutical care intervention on clinical outcomes and patient adherence in coronary heart disease: the MIMeRiC randomized controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Trial
- Impact of an enhanced pharmacy discharge service on prescribing appropriateness criteria: a randomised controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015Trial
- Characterising pharmacist interventions from person-centred medicines reviews in general practice settings.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Impact of a pharmacist adherence intervention on medication beliefs and drug-related problems in coronary patients - a process evaluation of the MIMeRiC trial.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Medication Experience and Associated Factors in Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions in Rural Henan Province, China: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 'You would rather not fill your body with pills'-patient perspectives on polypharmacy and medication reviews by pharmacists in general practice.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Symptom management in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant glioma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of Outcomes From Systemic Therapies.International journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and influencing factors of medication-related burden among patients with late-life depression in typical city of eastern China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Designing a tool ensuring older patients the right medication at the right time after discharge from hospital- the first step in a participatory design process.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- A Mixed-Method Study of Medication-Related Burden Among Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Patients in West Java, Indonesia.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024Article
- Handling polypharmacy -a qualitative study using focus group interviews with older patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Experiences of patients receiving Home Care and living with polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study.BJGP open · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators of micronutrient supplementation among non-pregnant women of reproductive age in Johannesburg, South Africa.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Patient values and preferences on polypharmacy and deprescribing: a scoping review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Exploring polypharmacy burden among elderly patients with chronic diseases in Chinese community: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Current Knowledge about Providing Drug-Drug Interaction Services for Patients-A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Impact of Polypharmacy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Dialysis Patients.American journal of nephrology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolypharmacy is increasing and managing large number of medicines may create a burden for patients. Many patients have negative views of medicines and their use can adversely affect quality of life. No studies have specifically explored the impact of general long-term medicines use on quality of life.
objectiveTo determine the issues which patients taking long-term medicines consider affect their day-to-day lives, including quality of life.
settingFour primary care general practices in North West England.
methodsFace-to-face interviews with adults living at home, prescribed four or more regular medicines for at least 1 year. Interviewees were identified from primary care medical records and purposively selected to ensure different types of medicines use. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.
resultsTwenty-one interviews were conducted and analysed. Patients used an average of 7.8 medicines, 51 % were preventive, 40 % for symptom relief and 9 % treatment. Eight themes emerged: relationships with health professionals, practicalities, information, efficacy, side effects, attitudes, impact and control. Ability to discuss medicines with health professionals varied and many views were coloured by negative experiences, mainly with doctors. All interviewees had developed routines for using multiple medicines, some requiring considerable effort. Few felt able to exert control over medicines routines specified by health professionals. Over half sought additional information about medicines whereas others avoided this, trusting in doctors to guide their medicines use. Patients recognised their inability to assess efficacy for many medicines, notably those used for prophylaxis. All were concerned about possible side effects and some had poor experiences of discussing concerns with doctors. Medicines led to restrictions on social activities and personal life to the extent that, for some, life can revolve around medicines.
conclusionThere is a multiplicity and complexity of issues surrounding medicines use, which impact on day-to-day lives for patients with long-term conditions. While most patients adapt to long-term medicines use, others did so at some cost to their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.