Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23990315›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Driving assessment for maintaining mobility and safety in drivers with dementia.

Alan J Martin, Richard Marottoli, Desmond O'Neill

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Common driving behaviors in older adults with dementia: Insights from a systematic literature review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Driving and Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist's role.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Top 10 Self Learning articles from 2017.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethical Challenges in Geriatric Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan J MartinDepartment of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Road, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Richard Marottoli
Desmond O'Neill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemographic changes are leading to an increase in the number of older drivers: as dementia is an age-related disease, there is also an increase in the numbers of drivers with dementia. Dementia can impact on both the mobility and safety of drivers, and the impact of formal assessment of driving is unknown in terms of either mobility or safety. Those involved in assessment of older drivers need to be aware of the evidence of positive and negative effects of driving assessment. Cognitive tests are felt by some authors to have poor face and construct validity for assessing driving performance; extrapolating from values in one large-scale prospective cohort study, the cognitive test that most strongly predicted future crashes would, if used as a screening tool, potentially prevent six crashes per 1000 people over 65 years of age screened, but at the price of stopping the driving of 121 people who would not have had a crash.

objectivesPRIMARY

objectives1. to assess whether driving assessment facilitates continued driving in people with dementia;2. to assess whether driving assessment reduces accidents in people with dementia. SECONDARY

objective1. to assess the quality of research on assessment of drivers with dementia. SEARCH

methodsALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia Group's Specialized Register was searched on 13 September 2012 using the terms: driving or driver* or "motor vehicle*" or "car accident*" or "traffic accident*" or automobile* or traffic. This register contains records from major healthcare databases, ongoing trial databases and grey literature sources and is updated regularly. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised controlled trials prospectively evaluating drivers with dementia for outcomes such as transport mobility, driving cessation or motor vehicle accidents following driving assessment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Each review author retrieved studies and assessed for primary and secondary outcomes, study design and study quality. MAIN

resultsNo studies were found that met the inclusion criteria. A description and discussion of the driving literature relating to assessment of drivers with dementia relating to the primary objectives is presented. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn an area with considerable public health impact for drivers with dementia and other road users, the available literature fails to demonstrate the benefit of driver assessment for either preserving transport mobility or reducing motor vehicle accidents. Driving legislation and recommendations from medical practitioners requires further research that addresses these outcomes in order to provide the best outcomes for both drivers with dementia and the general public.

Indexed as

SafetyAccidents, TrafficAgedAutomobile Driver ExaminationDementiaHumansTransportation

Identifiers

PMID23990315
PMCPMC7389479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.