ReviewAnimal cognition2014
Self-generated sounds of locomotion and ventilation and the evolution of human rhythmic abilities.
Review in Animal cognition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal Gait as a Potential Scaffold for Rhythm Processing: A Predictive Processing Network Model.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Toward a Fuller Integration of Respiratory Rhythms Into Research on Infant Vocal and Motor Development.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Review
- 4/4 and more, rhythmic complexity more strongly predicts groove in common meters.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Investigating Generalizability of Top-Down Neural Representation of Meter in Infancy.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Rhythmic categories in horse gait kinematics.Journal of anatomy · 2025Article
- The rhythm of horse gaits.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- Cetaceans are the next frontier for vocal rhythm research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- When sounds come alive: animacy in the auditory sense.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Does the Heel's Dissipative Energetic Behavior Affect Its Thermodynamic Responses During Walking?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Production of regular rhythm induced by external stimuli in rats.Animal cognition · 2021Article
- Rate of infant carrying impacts infant spontaneous motor tempo.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Article
- Chinese-English bilinguals show linguistic-perceptual links in the brain associating short spoken phrases with corresponding real-world natural action sounds by semantic category.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Evaluating a Speech-Specific and a Computerized Step-Training-Specific Rhythmic Intervention in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Over, Multi-Arms Parallel Study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Article
- Origins of music in credible signaling.The Behavioral and brain sciences · 2020Article
- Hearing and orally mimicking different acoustic-semantic categories of natural sound engage distinct left hemisphere cortical regions.Brain and language · 2018Article
- Is the Capacity for Vocal Learning in Vertebrates Rooted in Fish Schooling Behavior?Evolutionary biology · 2018Review
- Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.Neuropsychologia · 2017Review
- The Paradox of Isochrony in the Evolution of Human Rhythm.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Rhythmic entrainment: Why humans want to, fireflies can't help it, pet birds try, and sea lions have to be bribed.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that the basic building blocks of music mimic sounds of moving humans, and because the brain was primed to exploit such sounds, they eventually became incorporated in human culture. However, that raises further questions. Why do genetically close, culturally well-developed apes lack musical abilities? Did our switch to bipedalism influence the origins of music? Four hypotheses are raised: (1) Human locomotion and ventilation can mask critical sounds in the environment. (2) Synchronization of locomotion reduces that problem. (3) Predictable sounds of locomotion may stimulate the evolution of synchronized behavior. (4) Bipedal gait and the associated sounds of locomotion influenced the evolution of human rhythmic abilities. Theoretical models and research data suggest that noise of locomotion and ventilation may mask critical auditory information. People often synchronize steps subconsciously. Human locomotion is likely to produce more predictable sounds than those of non-human primates. Predictable locomotion sounds may have improved our capacity of entrainment to external rhythms and to feel the beat in music. A sense of rhythm could aid the brain in distinguishing among sounds arising from discrete sources and also help individuals to synchronize their movements with one another. Synchronization of group movement may improve perception by providing periods of relative silence and by facilitating auditory processing. The adaptive value of such skills to early ancestors may have been keener detection of prey or stalkers and enhanced communication. Bipedal walking may have influenced the development of entrainment in humans and thereby the evolution of rhythmic abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.