ReviewDer Anaesthesist2013
[Endovascular interventions in neuroradiology : New aspects].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- State of Practice: Endovascular Treatment of Acute Aneurysmal SAH in Germany.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Article
- [Intensive care treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
- [Management of anesthesia in endovascular interventions].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
- Airway management in general anesthesia for endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a retrospective observational study.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last 10 years interventional neuroradiology has become established especially in the endovascular treatment of aneurysms as the preferred treatment according to level 1 evidence and more recently in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. These interventions are performed as routine procedures in an increasing number of centers. This, however, necessitates that anesthesiologists and neuroradiologists become increasingly more familiar with the complementary expectations and potential pitfalls in working together to maximise efficiency and patient safety. As a further challenge there are different aspects to be considered in elective procedures and emergency procedures where time is brain. This article highlights these aspects for the two most common procedures: aneurysm treatment and multimodal recanalization treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23989963What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.