Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23989960›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2013

The RNA exosome and proteasome: common principles of degradation control.

Debora L Makino, Felix Halbach, Elena Conti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Substrate discrimination and quality control require each catalytic activity of TRAMP and the nuclear RNA exosome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Debora L MakinoDepartment of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Felix Halbach
Elena Conti
Max Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defective RNAs and proteins are swiftly degraded by cellular quality control mechanisms. A large fraction of their degradation is mediated by the exosome and the proteasome. These complexes have a similar architectural framework based on cylindrical, hollow structures that are conserved from bacteria and archaea to eukaryotes. Mechanistic similarities have also been identified for how RNAs and proteins are channelled into these structures and prepared for degradation. Insights gained from studies of the proteasome should now set the stage for elucidating the regulation, assembly and small-molecule inhibition of the exosome.

Indexed as

ProteolysisRNA StabilityArchaeaBacteriaEukaryotaExoribonucleasesExosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease ComplexProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexQuality ControlExoribonucleasesExosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease ComplexProteasome Endopeptidase Complex

Identifiers

PMID23989960
OpenAlexW1984971873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.