Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23989950›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2013

Phase II study of pazopanib monotherapy in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

H K Ahn, J Y Choi, K-M Kim, H Kim, S-H Choi, S H Park, J O Park, H Y Lim, W K Kang, J Lee and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Recent advances in drug delivery and targeting for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Programmed cell death, redox imbalance, and cancer therapeutics.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H K Ahn1] Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea [2] Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
J Y Choi
K-M Kim
H Kim
S-H Choi
S H Park
J O Park
H Y Lim
W K Kang
J Lee
Y S Park
Sungkyunkwan University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) are still limited. We investigated the antitumour activity and safety profile of pazopanib--a multitarget drug with anti-angiogenic activity in patients with metastatic GEP NETs.

methodsThis was a nonrandomised, open-labeled, single-center phase II study. Pazopanib was orally administered at a dose of 800 mg daily continuously with a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was an objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. An independent review of objective response was planned. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT number 01099540. Correlative biomarker analyses were performed.

resultsBetween April 2010 and February 2012, a total of 37 patients were enrolled. Thirty-two percent of the enrolled patients had pancreatic primary and 22% of the patients had colorectal primary NETs. This phase II study demonstrated an objective response rate of 18.9% (7 of the 37, 95% CI 8.0-35.2) and a disease control rate (CR+confirmed PR+stable disease) of 75.7% (28 of the 37, 95% CI, 58.8-88.2) in metastatic GEP NETs. The independent review demonstrated a higher overall response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8-41.2%) with nine confirmed PRs.

conclusionPazopanib showed a comparable efficacy to other targeted agents not only in pancreatic NETs but also in NETs originating from gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIndazolesIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPyrimidinesStomach NeoplasmsAngiogenesis InhibitorsIndazolespazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID23989950
PMCPMC3776983
OpenAlexW2085866999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.