Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23989756›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2013

Sharp diffusion front in diffusion problem with change of state.

Marat O Gallyamov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marat O GallyamovFaculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory 1-2, GSP-1, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation. glm@spm.phys.msu.ru

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an alternative model of diffusion in polymers, which may explain formation of propagating sharp diffusion fronts to be observed in some experiments. Differently from typical Case II or Stefan problem models, plasticisation of the polymer matrix is not necessarily required. Instead, diffusing small molecules are assumed to be captured by some specific sites of the polymer matrix for certain retention times. For example, they may become adsorbed at the surface of the holes and microvoids that are considered to be present in glassy polymer regions according to the well-known dual-sorption model and are attributed to excess free volume frozen into the glassy matrix. On the other hand, the small molecules may become bound to polymer chains. In this adsorbed/bound state they have much smaller movability and thus are effectively excluded from the diffusion. This adsorption/binding is considered to be a reversible process of state changing, but with asymmetric probabilities for direct and reverse events. With this assumption, taking into account that the amount of space available for such immobilised molecules is limited (limited free volume, limited number of anchoring sites) the model naturally results in the formation of sharp diffusion fronts or strong concentration gradients. Such a diffusion front is a region of effective immobilisation (adsorption/binding, though reversible) of the free diffusing molecules. For the simplest prescribed boundary conditions the diffusion front propagates linearly with the square root of time. By means of imposing generalised boundary conditions, it is possible to model other regimes of propagation of the diffusion front, including constant velocity.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.