Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23989751›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2013

Imaging features of medulloepithelioma: report of four cases and review of the literature.

Rakhee K Sansgiri, Matthew Wilson, M Beth McCarville, Kathleen J Helton

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Imaging of DICER1 syndrome.Pediatric radiology · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rakhee K SansgiriDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, MS 220, Memphis, TN, 38105-3678, USA.
Matthew Wilson
M Beth McCarville
Kathleen J Helton
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USLe Bonheur Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraocular medulloepithelioma is a childhood tumor arising from the nonpigmented primitive ciliary neuroepithelium. Although rarer than retinoblastoma, it remains the second most common primary intraocular neoplasm in children. The rarity of intraocular medulloepithelioma creates the challenge in establishing a clinical diagnosis, and radiologically the tumor is often confused with other intraocular masses.

objectiveTo describe the clinical, imaging and pathological features of intraocular medulloepithelioma with emphasis on the role of imaging to enable its differentiation from more common intraocular pathology. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical, histopathological and imaging data of four children with intraocular medulloepithelioma.

resultsAll four children had medulloepithelioma arising from the ciliary body. The children were imaged with US (n = 3), MRI (n = 4), whole-body (99m)Tc-MDP scintigraphy (n = 2) and CT (n = 1). All four children had enucleation of the involved eye. One tumor was a malignant teratoid variant, two tumors were malignant nonteratoid variants and one was a nonteratoid variant of uncertain malignant potential. None of the tumors had extraocular extension on histopathology or imaging. Two children had associated retinal detachment on US and MRI examinations. All tumors were iso/hyperintense to vitreous on T1-weighted and hypointense on T2-weighted MRI and showed marked contrast enhancement of the solid components. No calcifications were identified on US or CT examinations.

conclusionOur findings are consistent with previously reported cases of medulloepithelioma. This series emphasizes the roles of various imaging modalities, with pathological correlation, in differentiating the tumor from other ciliary body masses, in detecting tumor extension and in identifying associated ocular complications. In this series we also describe the results of postsurgical follow-up for tumor recurrence.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic ImagingEye NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveTreatment OutcomeVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID23989751
OpenAlexW1982146447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.