ArticleDer Orthopade2013
[Indications and limitations of minimally invasive stabilization of metastatic spinal disease].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Treatment strategies for pathological fractures of the spine].Der Unfallchirurg · 2021Review
- [Metastatic breast cancer in the spine : Molecular predictors for choosing adequate treatment strategies].Der Orthopade · 2018Review
- [Kyphoplasty combined with intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT). Alternative therapy for patients with oligometastatic spinal metastases].Der Radiologe · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The number of patients with symptomatic metastases increases from year to year. Especially spinal metastases often lead to severe pain which often cannot be treated adequately by conservative treatment. Surgeons are confronted with the risk of instability, pathological fractures and neurological failure and the surgical treatment necessary in most cases is nowadays becoming an even greater challenge. The surgical procedure has changed considerably in recent years. The therapy is patient-individualized, the selection of implants and technology is adapted to the physical condition of the patient and the progression of the underlying disease. The main targets of the surgical treatment of spinal metastases have to be sufficient pain reduction with restoration of mobility as well as with the prevention of neurological deficits caused by progressive osteolysis. There are two minimally invasive stabilization procedures which can basically be applied. Under certain circumstances a single kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty procedure can be sufficient, in contrast to the possibility of short or long percutaneous posterior stabilization in combination with selective decompression of neural structures. These percutaneous surgical procedures currently have an important place in the surgical treatment of spinal metastases. The advantages are a less traumatic intervention for patients with advanced malignant diseases and poor general condition. Low intraoperative loss of blood means less intraoperative stress for the patient and minor surgical approaches lead to rapid mobilization and effective pain relief. As a result the hospital stay is shorter, adjuvant therapy can be started earlier and patients can be discharged sooner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.