Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23989591›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2013

[Results-adapted operative treatment options for spinal metastases].

C E Heyde, J Gulow, N von der Höh, A Völker, D Jeszenszky, U Weber

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C E HeydeOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Christoph-Eckhard.Heyde@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
J Gulow
N von der Höh
A Völker
D Jeszenszky
U Weber
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik · DEDRK Kliniken Berlin · DELeipzig University · DESchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current operative approaches and technical possibilities in the operative treatment of spinal metastases are manifold which enables an individual operative strategy adapted to the patient's condition. Maintaining quality of life is the primary goal in the treatment of these patients. The therapeutic goals, such as pain control, avoidance of neurological deficits and the achievement of spinal stability have to be attained with as little morbidity as possible. From this perspective the available operative techniques ranging from minimally invasive approaches to complex reconstructive surgery will be addressed and discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeCombined Modality TherapyHumansLaminectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPlastic Surgery ProceduresRisk FactorsSpinal FusionSpinal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23989591
OpenAlexW2216313451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.