Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23988861›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2015

Relationship between knowledge about the harms of smoking and smoking status in the 2010 Global Adult Tobacco China Survey.

Hui G Cheng, Orla McBride, Michael R Phillips

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sociodemographic correlates of knowledge about high sodium-related diseases among adults in Malaysia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparing cigarette smoking knowledge and attitudes among smokers and non-smokers.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tobacco and the lung cancer epidemic in China.Translational lung cancer research · 2019
    Review
  13. Health information and life-course smoking behavior: evidence from Turkey.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. [Cigarette smoking in different manners induces acute lung injury in rats].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hui G ChengShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Orla McBrideSchool of Psychology, University of Ulster, Londonderry, Northern Ireland.
Michael R PhillipsShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China Departments of Psychiatry and Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shanghai Mental Health Center · CNUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis analysis estimates the association between smoking-related knowledge and smoking behaviour in a Chinese context. To identify the specific knowledge most directly related to smoking status, we used a novel latent variable analysis approach to adjust for the high correlations between different measures of knowledge about tobacco smoking.

methodData are from the Global Adult Tobacco China Survey, a nationally representative sample of 13 354 household-dwelling individuals 15 years of age or older. Multinomial logistic regressions estimated the association between smoking status (ie, never smoked, current smoker or past smoker) and four smoking-related beliefs: whether or not smoking causes lung cancer, heart attack and stroke, and whether or not low-tar cigarettes are less harmful. A latent variable approach reassessed these associations while taking into account the general level of knowledge about smoking.

resultsAfter demographic variables and general knowledge about smoking had been controlled for, the belief that low-tar cigarettes are not less harmful was more prevalent in persons who had never smoked than in current smokers (OR=1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.7) in men and OR=2.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.9) in women); this association was even stronger when past smokers and current smokers were compared (OR=2.1 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) in men and OR=5.0 (95% CI 1.3 to 20.1) in women).

conclusionsCompared with those who have never smoked and those who have ceased smoking, current smokers in China are more likely to believe that low-tar cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSmoking CessationTarsTobacco ProductsAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioSex FactorsTarsCessationLow/Middle income countryPrevention

Identifiers

PMID23988861
PMCPMC4283701
OpenAlexW2141570038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.