ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2013
An examination of racial differences in process and outcome of colorectal cancer care quality among users of the veterans affairs health care system.
Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs Health Care System In-Person and National TeleOncology Service-Delivered Care.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Racial comparisons in treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma and survival in the military health system.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Summary of Veterans Health Administration Cancer Data Sources.Journal of registry management · 2024Article
- Socioeconomic Disparities in Pancreas Cancer Resection and Survival in the Veterans Health Administration.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Patterns of overall mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in insured cancer patients in Southern California.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Article
- Veterans Affairs Insurance Disparities for Metastatic Lung Cancer in the Hawaiian Islands.JTO clinical and research reports · 2020Article
- Cancer Among Women Treated in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2019Article
- Chronic disease management perspectives of colorectal cancer survivors using the Veterans Affairs healthcare system: a qualitative analysis.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Changes in the Delivery of Veterans Affairs Cancer Care: Ensuring Delivery of Coordinated, Quality Cancer Care in a Time of Uncertainty.Journal of oncology practice · 2017Article
- Article
- Lung and colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system.Cancer management and research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVeterans Affairs (VA) manages the largest US integrated health care system. Although quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care is well chronicled, there is a paucity of research examining racial differences in this care. This study examines racial differences in 2 dimensions of quality of VA CRC care: processes (time to treatment) and outcomes (survival). PATIENTS AND
methodsRetrospective data were from the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP), a nationwide VA quality-monitoring program. Study patients were white and African American men diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC between 2003 and 2006 who received definitive CRC surgery. We examined 3 quality indicators: time from (1) surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (stages II-III disease), (2) surgery to surveillance colonoscopy (stages I-III disease), and (3) surgery to death (stages I-III disease). Unadjusted analyses used log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. Adjusted analyses used Cox proportional hazard models.
resultsIn unadjusted analyses, there was no evidence of racial differences across the 3 quality measures. In adjusted Cox regression, there were no racial differences in time to initiation of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; P = .61) or surgery to death (HR, 0.94; P = .49). In adjusted Cox regression, among those receiving colonoscopy within 7 to 18 months after surgery, white patients experienced slightly shorter median times to surveillance colonoscopy than did African American patients (367 vs. 383 days; HR, 0.63; P = .02).
conclusionOther than a small racial difference in timing of surveillance colonoscopy, there was little evidence of racial differences in quality of CRC care among VA health care system users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.