Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23988481›Full record

ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2013

An examination of racial differences in process and outcome of colorectal cancer care quality among users of the veterans affairs health care system.

Leah L Zullig, George L Jackson, Morris Weinberger, Dawn Provenzale, Bryce B Reeve, William R Carpenter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah L ZulligCenter of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: zullig@email.unc.edu.
George L Jackson
Morris Weinberger
Dawn Provenzale
Bryce B Reeve
William R Carpenter
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

Cancer Training GrantR25CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BASCH, ETHAN M., REEVE, BRYCE B · 2008 to 2017
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS 5R25CA116339NCI NIH HHS R25 CA116339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeterans Affairs (VA) manages the largest US integrated health care system. Although quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care is well chronicled, there is a paucity of research examining racial differences in this care. This study examines racial differences in 2 dimensions of quality of VA CRC care: processes (time to treatment) and outcomes (survival). PATIENTS AND

methodsRetrospective data were from the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP), a nationwide VA quality-monitoring program. Study patients were white and African American men diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC between 2003 and 2006 who received definitive CRC surgery. We examined 3 quality indicators: time from (1) surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (stages II-III disease), (2) surgery to surveillance colonoscopy (stages I-III disease), and (3) surgery to death (stages I-III disease). Unadjusted analyses used log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. Adjusted analyses used Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsIn unadjusted analyses, there was no evidence of racial differences across the 3 quality measures. In adjusted Cox regression, there were no racial differences in time to initiation of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; P = .61) or surgery to death (HR, 0.94; P = .49). In adjusted Cox regression, among those receiving colonoscopy within 7 to 18 months after surgery, white patients experienced slightly shorter median times to surveillance colonoscopy than did African American patients (367 vs. 383 days; HR, 0.63; P = .02).

conclusionOther than a small racial difference in timing of surveillance colonoscopy, there was little evidence of racial differences in quality of CRC care among VA health care system users.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitals, VeteransHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransColorectal neoplasmsHealth care disparitiesHealth care qualityMinority healthUS Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID23988481
PMCPMC3838793
OpenAlexW1977522801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.