Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23987232›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Course of COPD assessment test (CAT) and clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) scores during recovery from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Marc Miravitlles, Patricia García-Sidro, Alonso Fernández-Nistal, María Jesús Buendía, María José Espinosa de los Monteros, Jesús Molina

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. How to Assess Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of CAT in evaluating the response to treatment of patients with AECOPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Health Status of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Symptom Level.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. The concept of control of COPD in clinical practice.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2014
    Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERS), Barcelona, Spain. mmiravitlles@vhebron.net.
Patricia García-Sidro
Alonso Fernández-Nistal
María Jesús Buendía
María José Espinosa de los Monteros
Jesús Molina
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOPD exacerbations have a negative impact on lung function, decrease quality of life (QoL) and increase the risk of death. The objective of this study was to assess the course of health status after an outpatient or inpatient exacerbation in patients with COPD.

methodsThis is an epidemiological, prospective, multicentre study that was conducted in 79 hospitals and primary care centres in Spain. Four hundred seventy-six COPD patients completed COPD assessment test (CAT) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) questionnaires during the 24 hours after presenting at hospital or primary care centres with symptoms of an exacerbation, and also at weeks 4-6. The scores from the CAT and CCQ were evaluated and compared at baseline and after recovery from the exacerbation.

resultsA total of 164 outpatients (33.7%) and 322 inpatients (66.3%) were included in the study. The majority were men (88.2%), the mean age was 69.4 years (SD = 9.5) and the mean FEV1 (%) was 47.7% (17.4%). During the exacerbation, patients presented high scores in the CAT: [mean: 22.0 (SD = 7.0)] and the CCQ: [mean: 4.4 (SD = 1.2)]. After recovery there was a significant reduction in the scores of both questionnaires [CAT: mean: -9.9 (SD = 5.1) and CCQ: mean: -3.1 (SD = 1.1)]. Both questionnaires showed a strong correlation during and after the exacerbation and the best predictor of the magnitude of improvement in the scores was the severity of each score at onset.

conclusionsDue to their good correlation, CAT and CCQ can be useful tools to measure health status during an exacerbation and to evaluate recovery. However, new studies are necessary in order to identify which factors are influencing the course of the recovery of health status after a COPD exacerbation.

Indexed as

Health StatusPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesConfidence IntervalsDisease ProgressionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID23987232
PMCPMC3765881
OpenAlexW2147315090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.