ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
The situated HKB model: how sensorimotor spatial coupling can alter oscillatory brain dynamics.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oscillatory dynamics as the coordination layer of the organism: waves, Markov blankets, and the virtual space of cognition.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Review
- The illusion of internal models in biological movement.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Review
- Collective decision making by embodied neural agents.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Pink noise promotes sooner state transitions during bimanual coordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Neural Aspects of Prospective Control through Resonating Taus in an Interceptive Timing Task.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Test-Retest Reliability of Synchrony and Metastability in Resting State fMRI.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Reciprocity and alignment: quantifying coupling in dynamic interactions.Royal Society open science · 2021Review
- Unifying Large- and Small-Scale Theories of Coordination.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An exploration of neural dynamics of motor imagery for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Article
- Extended Neural Metastability in an Embodied Model of Sensorimotor Coupling.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016Article
- The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- The worldly constituents of perceptual presence.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
- Putting reins on the brain. How the body and environment use it.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
- Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget's theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increase of both dynamic and embodied/situated approaches in cognitive science, there is still little research on how coordination dynamics under a closed sensorimotor loop might induce qualitatively different patterns of neural oscillations compared to those found in isolated systems. We take as a departure point the Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) model, a generic model for dynamic coordination between two oscillatory components, which has proven useful for a vast range of applications in cognitive science and whose dynamical properties are well understood. In order to explore the properties of this model under closed sensorimotor conditions we present what we call the situated HKB model: a robotic model that performs a gradient climbing task and whose "brain" is modeled by the HKB equation. We solve the differential equations that define the agent-environment coupling for increasing values of the agent's sensitivity (sensor gain), finding different behavioral strategies. These results are compared with two different models: a decoupled HKB with no sensory input and a passively-coupled HKB that is also decoupled but receives a structured input generated by a situated agent. We can precisely quantify and qualitatively describe how the properties of the system, when studied in coupled conditions, radically change in a manner that cannot be deduced from the decoupled HKB models alone. We also present the notion of neurodynamic signature as the dynamic pattern that correlates with a specific behavior and we show how only a situated agent can display this signature compared to an agent that simply receives the exact same sensory input. To our knowledge, this is the first analytical solution of the HKB equation in a sensorimotor loop and qualitative and quantitative analytic comparison of spatially coupled vs. decoupled oscillatory controllers. Finally, we discuss the limitations and possible generalization of our model to contemporary neuroscience and philosophy of mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.