Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23986254›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Ventral tegmental dopamine dysregulation prevents appetitive memory destabilization.

Amy C Reichelt, Marc T Exton-McGuinness, Jonathan L C Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Muscarinic receptor activation overrides boundary conditions on memory updating in a calcium/calmodulin-dependent manner.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Generalization and recovery of post-retrieval amnesia.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2020
    Article
  11. Activation of cortical MScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Update on Memory Reconsolidation Updating.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy C ReicheltSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. a.reichelt@unsw.edu.au
Marc T Exton-McGuinness
Jonathan L C Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through the process of reconsolidation, memories can be updated to maintain their relevance. To reconsolidate, a memory must first be destabilized in a process that we have hypothesized is initiated by a prediction error signal. Here we demonstrate that dysregulation of ventral tegmental area (VTA) signaling, which is thought to mediate prediction errors, prevented the destabilization of an appetitive goal-tracking memory in rats. We additionally show that intra-VTA infusion of either the competitive NMDA antagonist AP5 or the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 does not selectively disrupt reconsolidation, indicating that the VTA may not be an important neural locus of reconsolidation-related neural plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetitive BehaviorDopamine AntagonistsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGoalsMaleMemoryRatsRats, Inbred StrainsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateVentral Tegmental AreaDopamine AntagonistsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID23986254
PMCPMC6618505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.